I was researching fonts and came across this from http://www.pcworld.com/article/216784/ugly_fonts_aid_memory.html. According to this it is easier to get a message cross with an uglier font. Perhaps because people learn better when it's a struggle to do so, content written in difficult-to-read fonts is more readily remembered than content rendered in visually pleasing fonts, a group of researchers has found.
In both lab experiments and in classroom trials, the researchers found that people learn new written information more easily if that information is presented in a font that is comparatively difficult to read, rather than with a font that is easier on the eyes.
Their results fall in line with other educational research that shows that the more challenging it is for people to learn new material, the more thoroughly they will ultimately understand that material.
A Princeton University student, Connor Diemand-Yauman, conducted the research, with the help of adviser Daniel Oppenheimer and Indiana University doctoral student Erikka Vaughan. In a series of lab tests, volunteers were asked to memorise a set of physical characteristics attributed to hard-to-remember fictional names of an alien species. Some of the lists were rendered in either Comic Sans MS or Bodini MT, fonts considered difficult to read. The other lists were rendered in the more appealing Arial font. Those who read the characteristics in the fonts that were difficult to read, or "disfluent" as the researchers called them, scored 14 percent better on the memory test than those who read the Arial font.
The researchers also found this improved performance holds in the classroom as well. Classroom presentations and worksheets for 222 Ohio high school students were rendered in three highly disfluent fonts -- Haettenschweiler, Monotype Corsiva and Comic Sans Italicized. The students with these materials learned the material more thoroughly than their peers who used the original material, the researchers reported.
Here is my artists name in the three disfluent fonts: Haettenschweiler, Monotype Corsiva and Comic Sans Italicized: Erick Baker, Erick Baker, Erick
Baker. I am going to look at a series of 'Uglier' fonts and have feedback to see if reaklly makes nthem more memorable.
I also looked at http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/08/13/the-typography-of-authority-do-fonts-affect-how-people-accept-information/ and from here I found that A recent two-part series by Errol Morris in the New York Times sought to explore fonts and their effect on credulity — their ability to generate “truthiness” themselves.
Morris did this in a clever way, writing an initial column ostensibly testing whether readers were optimists or pessimists based on how they responded to statements called out separately from the main text. With the assistance of a computer programmer, Morris was able to show each viewer these statements in one of six randomly generated fonts — Georgia, Comic Sans, Baskerville, Computer Modern, Trebuchet, or Helvetica.
Then, through analysis of the more than 45,000 quiz results, he and David Dunning, a psychology professor at Cornell, were able to draw some conclusions.
In short, Baskerville proved to be what they call “the king of fonts,” making the true statements more likely to be accepted and less likely to be dismissed. The p-value was 0.0068.
Baskerville was so good for conveying information because it “disappeared” to the reader more easily than other fonts with more exotic strokes, x-heights, or designs, allowing almost unconscious absorption of the underlying information.
This is my artists name in Baskerville: Erick Baker. I am going to test this out aswell too see what kind of reception it has.
I also looked at http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/08/13/the-typography-of-authority-do-fonts-affect-how-people-accept-information/ and from here I found that A recent two-part series by Errol Morris in the New York Times sought to explore fonts and their effect on credulity — their ability to generate “truthiness” themselves.
Morris did this in a clever way, writing an initial column ostensibly testing whether readers were optimists or pessimists based on how they responded to statements called out separately from the main text. With the assistance of a computer programmer, Morris was able to show each viewer these statements in one of six randomly generated fonts — Georgia, Comic Sans, Baskerville, Computer Modern, Trebuchet, or Helvetica.
Then, through analysis of the more than 45,000 quiz results, he and David Dunning, a psychology professor at Cornell, were able to draw some conclusions.
In short, Baskerville proved to be what they call “the king of fonts,” making the true statements more likely to be accepted and less likely to be dismissed. The p-value was 0.0068.
Baskerville was so good for conveying information because it “disappeared” to the reader more easily than other fonts with more exotic strokes, x-heights, or designs, allowing almost unconscious absorption of the underlying information.
This is my artists name in Baskerville: Erick Baker. I am going to test this out aswell too see what kind of reception it has.
These are some of the favouriote fonts for September 2013 picked by the staff at http://www.fontshop.com/fontlist/staff_picks/staff_picks_september_2013/
One of the most popular fonts is Akzidenz-Grotesk, it was first released by the Berthold Type Foundry in 1896 in Germany, its popularity increased after it was developed in the 1950s under the direction of Gunter Gerhard Lange with a wider range of weights and variants. He also influenced famous fonts such as Helvetica. It doesn't over dominate when used but it still has strength and impact.
Here are difffrent variations of my artists name in Akzidenz-Grotesk.
I prefer A-G (Akzidenz-Grotesk) BQ Medium and BQ Light, having the artists name in Italic is definitely not something I will be considering, it would make it look unprofessional and would have less of an impact. I think A-G BQ Medium is something I would consider, the same kind of font has been used for similar artists such as Ben Howard so I think it is something I will definitely consider.
I don't particularly like any of these fonts, as mentioned before I am not looking for Italic fonts but I also don't want the font too bold it just makes it look messy and too much I think, for an artist that is indie acoustic I think they want something a little bit more laid back, less edgy.
I like A-G BQ Light Condensed, I think this quite quirky and relaxed compare to others, I think it would reflect the artist well. I also like A-G BQ Condensed and Medium Condensed, but because of how similar these fonts are I am going to ask the target audience which they prefer and why an which are most memorable.